Inbox Skeptic

During our March meeting, asked members of the JSS to provide me with email forwards that might need a bit of skepticism.

So far, only one has arrived, and, I must admit, I sent that one to myself. So prepare to see something you’ve seen before be debunked. I hope none of it was too important to you. Or, rather, I hope it was, and this changes your life forever. (Highly doubtful).

This is the offender, an email/message board post you’ve likely seen or been exposed to in the past:

“Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn’t mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteers be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe.”

And

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s